首页> 外文OA文献 >Interlaboratory evaluation of different extraction and real-time PCR methods for detection of Coxiella burnetii DNA in serum
【2h】

Interlaboratory evaluation of different extraction and real-time PCR methods for detection of Coxiella burnetii DNA in serum

机译:实验室中不同提取和实时PCR方法检测血清中柯氏杆菌DNA的实验室间评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In the Netherlands, there is an ongoing and unparalleled outbreak of Q fever. Rapid and reliable methods to identify patients infected with Coxiella burnetii, the causative agent of Q fever, are urgently needed. We evaluated the performance of different DNA extraction methods and real-time PCR assays that are in use in seven diagnostic or reference laboratories in the Netherlands. A low degree of variation in the sensitivities of most of the developed real-time PCR assays was observed. However, PCR assays amplifying short DNA fragments yielded better results than those producing large DNA fragments. With regard to DNA extraction, the automated MagNA Pure Compact system and the manual QIAamp DNA mini kit consistently yielded better results than either the MagNA Pure LC system and NucliSens EasyMag (both automated) or the High Pure viral nucleic acid kit (manual). The present study shows that multiple combinations of DNA extraction kits and real-time PCR assays offer equivalent solutions to detect C. burnetii DNA in serum samples from patients suspected to have Q fever.
机译:在荷兰,持续不断且无与伦比的Q热爆发。迫切需要一种快速可靠的方法来鉴定感染柯氏杆菌(Q病的病原体)的患者。我们评估了荷兰七个诊断或参考实验室使用的不同DNA提取方法和实时PCR测定的性能。观察到大多数已开发的实时PCR分析灵敏度的低度变化。但是,PCR扩增短的DNA片段比产生大的DNA片段的结果更好。关于DNA提取,与MagNA Pure LC系统和NucliSens EasyMag(均为自动化)或High Pure病毒核酸试剂盒(手动)相比,自动化MagNA Pure Compact系统和手动QIAamp DNA mini试剂盒始终产生更好的结果。本研究表明,DNA提取试剂盒和实时PCR分析的多种组合提供了等效的解决方案,可用于检测疑似Q发热患者血清样品中的伯氏梭菌DNA。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号